What's the difference where the recording is made? Whether it's at my home or a network from my cable provider.
The studios argued in the Cablevision lawsuit that because the company was doing the recording, not individual customers, their copyrights were being violated.
Cablevision contended that its network technology was comparable to individuals recording shows in their homes because it was planning to dedicate separate storage space for each subscriber. In other words, if 10,000 subscribers decided to record the show "Lost," 10,000 separate copies would be made in the network, Cablevision said.
The fact that Cablevision was willing to save separate copies of TV shows for every customer shows that they were willing to play fair. They could have said that they were storing all shows together, to save storage space.
A network DVR would save cable companies money since they wouldn't have to distribute set-top DVRs to customers. It's a forward-thinking approach, which would have left set-top box makers like Scientific Atlanta and Motorola worried about their revenue streams.
It would be a win for consumers as well. Why buy a stand-alone DVR when you can buy hard drive space on a TV provider's network? An HD Tivo DVR costs $800, plus monthly fees of about $20 per month. Instead, customers can avoid paying $800 and have one less box under their TV sets.
So what happens if I want to host my own media remotely? Like in a network attached server, where I keep files for streaming or products like Sling or Orb that allow you to view TV shows from anywhere with an Internet connection.
Cablevision said it is thinking about appealing, which I hope they do. This judge's decision is stuck in the 90s.
Last week, I discussed why network DVRs are the future. Despite some of their negatives, I hope they can survive.
RSS Feed
Twitter
Posted in